I have an EXI-250 and it is my very first bird, and to this date, my only bird.
This probably raises a few red flags, most of all, why the hell is a heli-noob starting off on a 250? The answer, I love challenges. That said, the fact that I have put over 60 hours of flight time into this thing over the past year and it is still flying is a testament to the 250's resilience when it comes to kissing terra firma.
The EXI parts are pretty good, but the feathering shaft is reported to be weak and that the screws will sometimes pull through and allow the blades to separate. I cannot testify to this as I heeded the caution and just replaced the feathering shaft with the Align branded part from the get-go. I have not really had any failures attributed to poor quality. I have crashed her about a dozen times now, with two crashes being very violent.
On the 23rd of this month, I lost my tail rotor due to a poor jury-rigging on my behalf while flying at about 60 feet above asphalt. I watched as my heli spun at about 4-5 revolutions per second and I slowly lowered the collective and brought it down under control. I lightly touched the ground, but the rotational speed was too great and the heli tipped over, leading to a triple boom strike. The casualties? Feathering shaft, tail boom, tail servo control rod, one of the tail servo control rod holders, one of the carbon fiber tail boom supports, and a very slight bend to the main shaft. The cause of the crash was a make-shift repair that I had made, and this brings up one of the caveats of buying an EXI-250. But first, here are some photos of the carnage. At the bottom of the photo with the casualties, you will see the tail drive gear assembly that failed, along with the upper housing for this part which will be mentioned shortly.


The item that triggered this latest crash, my first in over 30 battery charges, was the gear that drives the tail rotor belt. The EXI model has two aluminum housings that cradle the two bearings on the tail drive shaft. There is a top housing and a bottom housing. The Trex250, however, has the housing split left and right. The result is that the replacement part for the Trex drive shaft is the shaft, two bearings, the large gear that engages the main gear, and the smaller gear that drives the belt. You separate the left and right housings and fit them around the replacement shaft, then slide the whole assembly into the helicopter frame. Since the EXI housings do not split left/right, you have to remove one of the gears in order to fit the shaft through the openings in the housings. The easiest one would be the belt drive gear since the lower gear would require the removal of both bearings and the gear that engages the main gear. The Trex part, however, cannot be disassembled. The belt gear appears to be held in place with a small screw, but in reality this screw is utterly pointless since the belt gear is not only pressed onto a fluted shaft, it is red-loctited into place. Chinese engineering at its finest.
So how and why did I jury-rig this part? The short answer, the bearing in the EXI shaft failed and I wanted to see if I could make the Trex part work without having to order the EXI part every time. I used a pair of snips to mangle the Trex belt gear until I could pull the remains off of the shaft. Once this was done, I took my existing EXI belt gear and slid it onto the shaft after pushing the shaft up through the upper housing. Since it was a loose fit, I soldered the belt gear onto the shaft. It seemed like a good idea at the time.
Ultimately what had happened is that after about a dozen flights, I lost the tail. I thought that my solder job had failed, but upon closer examination, I found that the lower gear, the plastic one that engages the main gear, had melted where it engaged the shaft. I did not provide enough clearance between the upper housing and the belt gear, so while flying, this part was generating metal-on-metal friction until the heat caused the plastic gear to fail. Oops. Moral of the story, don't jury rig this part. Second moral of the story, not every Trex part is compatible with the EXI.
I have since repaired the heli and gotten her in the air. I had to order a replacement tail drive shaft from EXI. From my experience, the only three parts that are not compatible between the Trex and the EXI are the tail drive shaft, and to some extent, the bottom plate, and the landing gears. The EXI has a one-piece bottom plate and landing gear, so if you snap one of them, you have to buy an Trex bottom plate AND a landing gear set. I am going to order the Trex tail drive housings and see if they fit the EXI frame. If so, I can continue to use the locally available Trex tail drive shafts if I ever need to replace it.
So to an extent, I am slowly converting this EXI into a Trex through replacing damaged parts, but so far just about everything has been compatible. The only major change that I have made is the utilization of a tail assembly from microHeli since this part is vastly superior to the EXI and Trex offerings. The tail wag that I had was completely eliminated with this upgrade.
I will provide my parts list, in case anyone decides to get an EXI-250. I have zero tail-wag and the tail holds rock-steady in heading-hold mode. The tail drifts slowly (approximately 180 degrees per minute) when in rate mode, but this is to be expected.
Motor: Exceed RC 75M60
Battery: Hyperion 850mAh 3S LiPo (tight fit in canopy, but will not fit well in a Trex since the battery holder is at a different angle than the EXI)
Cyclic Servos: Hitec HS-65HB
Tail Servo: JR DS290G (this thing is really fast and light weight)
Gyro: Spartan Quark
ESC: 30A Quantum (a bit big for this heli, but the only thing that was available locally at the time)
Receiver: Spektrum AR6210
- - - Updated - - -
Ooops, forgot to post the picture of the failed parts. Here you can see in the lower left, the tail drive shaft and upper housing as sold by EXI. The housing comes pre-attached and the shaft cannot be removed from the housing. This was my jury-rigged part that failed.
And here is a photo after the reincarnation.
As an aside, I got to fly a Trex450 last month and the thing was downright docile compared to the 250. I have gotten quite good at holding the 250 in position, even in gusty conditions, but the 450 was like turning on Easy-mode. I still have a training gear attached to my 250 and probably will until I start to do more advanced maneuvers, but the docility of the 450 gives me confidence that I could easily fly without training gears attached. Now I am eyeballing the EXI-450 so that I can have a bigger bird.
