Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New articles
New article comments
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Welcome To Rc-Help.com
RC-Help Lounge
What Did You Do Today???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="murankar" data-source="post: 162352" data-attributes="member: 274"><p>I have found that when I do my IR values drop a little. There are 2 arguments to break in. One camp says it better for the battery and it improves the IR rates for a longer period of time; the other camp says it doesn't make a lick of difference. Then to top it off there isn't enough substantiating proof that says one is more right than the other. </p><p></p><p>In have been breaking in my packs since I started flying the X3. I will have to see what data I have in my pl6 for IR ratings on my 570 packs. See if I can post a historical chart.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="murankar, post: 162352, member: 274"] I have found that when I do my IR values drop a little. There are 2 arguments to break in. One camp says it better for the battery and it improves the IR rates for a longer period of time; the other camp says it doesn't make a lick of difference. Then to top it off there isn't enough substantiating proof that says one is more right than the other. In have been breaking in my packs since I started flying the X3. I will have to see what data I have in my pl6 for IR ratings on my 570 packs. See if I can post a historical chart. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Welcome To Rc-Help.com
RC-Help Lounge
What Did You Do Today???
Top
Bottom
