Point of fact from the article Kev linked:
This is why the FAA may end up winning this. Not because they have regulatory authority over commercial UAS flights, but because they're going to claim authority over anything in the air that is flown in a reckless/dangerous manner. I still think they'll lose, but it is just "feel good" enough if it gets in front of the right judge at the right time (preferably after someone loses an eye from an RC heli/airplane/quad out of control) they it may well go their way.
As to RF7 sessions, the RF gusy have them already, though it seems less frequently than the Phoenix sim users on this forum.
While a dozen other drone pilots have received cease-and-desist letters, Pirker is the only one who’s been fined, and he is willing to spend the money for a legal challenge. The difference, FAA’s Dorr says, is that Pirker was cited not for commercial drone use but for “careless and reckless operation of the unmanned aircraft.
This is why the FAA may end up winning this. Not because they have regulatory authority over commercial UAS flights, but because they're going to claim authority over anything in the air that is flown in a reckless/dangerous manner. I still think they'll lose, but it is just "feel good" enough if it gets in front of the right judge at the right time (preferably after someone loses an eye from an RC heli/airplane/quad out of control) they it may well go their way.
As to RF7 sessions, the RF gusy have them already, though it seems less frequently than the Phoenix sim users on this forum.